Michael Jackson Housekeeper: Witness to Wade Robson Molestation...
Blanca
Francia's testimony during Jackson's 2005 child molestation trial
included a graphic account of MJ showering naked with a young Wade
Robson.
Francia described seeing Michael's underwear on the floor outside the Neverland Ranch shower, as well as Wade's child-sized neon green underwear.
She said she couldn't see exactly what the King of Pop was doing in there because the shower door was fogged up, but said she heard him laughing.
Despite Francia's story, Michael was acquitted - in no small part because Wade himself also testified and insisted Jackson never abused him.
That's the opposite, of course, of what he is claiming now.
Robson is planning to argue that the late icon's companies, MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, had a duty to protect him when he was a young boy.
Because they were involved in recruiting him from Australia to work with Michael - who he says abused him from ages 7-14 - they are liable today.
According to TMZ, Wade wants to use Blanca's 2005 testimony to show Michael abused him, and hope that she will cooperate in his new case as well.
Robson has been hammered by MJ's former attorney Tom Mesereau, as well as Michael's nephew Taj Jackson, his ex-wife Debbie Rowe, and others.
Michael's camp says Wade is obviously changing his story now because he's motivated by money, and point to his moving 2005 account - under oath.
Wade says he understands this, but is adamant that he's not lying now.
“I never forgot one moment of what Michael did,” he said. “But I was psychologically unable and unwilling to understand that it was sexual abuse.”
“I lived in silence and denial for 22 years," Robson went on, noting that he suffered nervous breakdowns that nearly ended his career two years ago.
"In order to heal, I have to speak the truth and speak the whole truth."
- See more at: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/05/michael-jackson-housekeeper-witness-to-wade-robson-molestation/#sthash.TEZMrCzf.dpuf
A housekeeper who once described seeing Wade Robson in the shower with Michael Jackson may be the key to the former's claims of molestation.Francia described seeing Michael's underwear on the floor outside the Neverland Ranch shower, as well as Wade's child-sized neon green underwear.
She said she couldn't see exactly what the King of Pop was doing in there because the shower door was fogged up, but said she heard him laughing.
Despite Francia's story, Michael was acquitted - in no small part because Wade himself also testified and insisted Jackson never abused him.
That's the opposite, of course, of what he is claiming now.
Robson is planning to argue that the late icon's companies, MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, had a duty to protect him when he was a young boy.
Because they were involved in recruiting him from Australia to work with Michael - who he says abused him from ages 7-14 - they are liable today.
According to TMZ, Wade wants to use Blanca's 2005 testimony to show Michael abused him, and hope that she will cooperate in his new case as well.
Robson has been hammered by MJ's former attorney Tom Mesereau, as well as Michael's nephew Taj Jackson, his ex-wife Debbie Rowe, and others.
Michael's camp says Wade is obviously changing his story now because he's motivated by money, and point to his moving 2005 account - under oath.
Wade says he understands this, but is adamant that he's not lying now.
“I never forgot one moment of what Michael did,” he said. “But I was psychologically unable and unwilling to understand that it was sexual abuse.”
“I lived in silence and denial for 22 years," Robson went on, noting that he suffered nervous breakdowns that nearly ended his career two years ago.
"In order to heal, I have to speak the truth and speak the whole truth."
- See more at: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/05/michael-jackson-housekeeper-witness-to-wade-robson-molestation/#sthash.TEZMrCzf.dpuf
Robson, 30, recently accused Jackson of sexual abuse in a claim against his estate, then defended himself on Today, calling Michael a pedophile.
Blanca Francia's testimony during Jackson's 2005 child molestation trial included a graphic account of MJ showering naked with a young Wade Robson.
Francia described seeing Michael's underwear on the floor outside the Neverland Ranch shower, as well as Wade's child-sized neon green underwear.
She said she couldn't see exactly what the King of Pop was doing in there because the shower door was fogged up, but said she heard him laughing.
Despite Francia's story, Michael was acquitted - in no small part because Wade himself also testified and insisted Jackson never abused him.
That's the opposite, of course, of what he is claiming now.
Robson is planning to argue that the late icon's companies, MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, had a duty to protect him when he was a young boy.
Because they were involved in recruiting him from Australia to work with Michael - who he says abused him from ages 7-14 - they are liable today.
According to TMZ, Wade wants to use Blanca's 2005 testimony to show Michael abused him, and hope that she will cooperate in his new case as well.
Robson has been hammered by MJ's former attorney Tom Mesereau, as well as Michael's nephew Taj Jackson, his ex-wife Debbie Rowe, and others.
Michael's camp says Wade is obviously changing his story now because he's motivated by money, and point to his moving 2005 account - under oath.
Wade says he understands this, but is adamant that he's not lying now.
“I never forgot one moment of what Michael did,” he said. “But I was psychologically unable and unwilling to understand that it was sexual abuse.”
“I lived in silence and denial for 22 years," Robson went on, noting that he suffered nervous breakdowns that nearly ended his career two years ago.
"In order to heal, I have to speak the truth and speak the whole truth."
First off, in her deposition in 1994, Blanca Francia said she saw only one image behind the shower door - that of MJ. Since he was laughing she assumed that there was someone else there but she did not see any other figure except MJ. Years later at the 2005 trial, Francia suddenly remembered the story "so well" that she added some fictional details to it. However, Tom Mesereau quickly refreshed her memory about her previous deposition. So in 2005, Francia was blatantly lying. There was also a picture of the shower that showed that Francia could not have seen anything even in theory as even when the door was wide open, you could not see the shower except for perhaps a very small part of it. In addition, she admitted under oath that she had been paid by certain media outlets for her story.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, if he is suing MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures on the grounds that they failed to protect him, then why does he not appear to have taken any action against his mother considering that she had more of a responsibility for his safety than any of the other parties being sued? After all, his mother continuously approved, trusted, and defended Michael and his relationship with her son in her testimonies in 1993 and in 2005 during the trial.
If Wade is to be believed, then I’m sure his mother’s continuous approval, trust, and defense of Michael and his relationship with her son (even after Michael was accused of and investigated for child molestation in 1993, because what responsible parent would allow his or her child to associate with someone accused of child molestation unless he or she knew that that person was innocent) helped make it possible for the alleged abuse to occur thus showing her to be an unfit parent and thus making her culpable for Wade's alleged abuse.
Even though Wade's mother may not be liable considering that he is now an adult, she's still culpable for his alleged abuse. Even if she were to now say that she said the things she said in Michael’s defense for reasons other than it being the truth, not only would she have perjured herself (destroying her credibility just as Wade has despite the fact that the statute of limitations has run out), but she’d still be culpable for her son’s alleged abuse.
Forgive me if I sound naive, but if Wade's mother can't be held legally accountable for his alleged abuse, I'm curious to know why can parties like MJJ Ventures and MJJ Productions be held responsible considering that it was through Wade's decision (with his mother's approval and acceptance) to personally associate with Michael outside of the confines of his business relationship with the pre-mentioned parties that he was allowed to be made vulnerable to any alleged abuse by him?
Anyways, if Wade truly wants to make those who were responsible for protecting him answer for their alleged failure to do so, would it not make sense for him to take at least some kind of action against his mother? In my opinion, if Wade is being truthful about not making his accusations for money (as he alleged during his interview on the Today Show - despite the fact that he filed both a creditors claim and a civil lawsuit) and wants to hold the parties who were responsible for protecting him accountable for his alleged abuse, then the fact that he's willing to play the blame game and point fingers at these other parties and yet not place blame where blame is due in regards to his mother is very telling of what his true motives are in my opinion.